Integrated full pulse modeling for pellet injection in tokamaks: HPI2 model improvement and validation in WEST
A. Panera Alvarez, F. Koechl, J. Artaud, E. Geulin, B. P\'egouri\'e, E. Vergnaud, C. Bourdelle, S. Wiesen, and the WEST Team

TL;DR
This paper presents an improved, validated physics-based pellet injection model (HPI2) for tokamaks, enhancing predictive capabilities for core density control in fusion reactors like WEST and ITER.
Contribution
The upgraded HPI2 model self-consistently determines plasmoid release from ablation physics, improving robustness and accuracy in integrated tokamak simulations.
Findings
HPI2 model validated against WEST discharge with ~10% error.
Coupled simulations reproduce main density and temperature transients post-injection.
Supports use of pellet modeling in integrated simulations for ITER.
Abstract
Reliable modeling and control of core density is essential for reactor-relevant magnetic confinement fusion operation, motivating cryogenic pellet injection as a primary fueling actuator and the need for predictive pellet source models in integrated modeling. Here we present an upgrade of the physics-based pellet code HPI2 in which the plasmoid release spatial step is determined self-consistently from ablation physics, (optionally rescaled to trade accuracy for computational cost), removing an ad-hoc discretization parameter and improving numerical robustness across injection conditions. The upgraded model is first validated in stand-alone against a high-field-side pellet-fueled, ohmic, WEST discharge (#58656) by comparing synthetic and measured interferometry line-integrated density increments, obtaining a mean error of . We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
