Aligning LLM Uncertainty with Human Disagreement in Subjectivity Analysis
Junyu Lu, Deyi Ji, Xuanyi Liu, Lanyun Zhu, Bo Xu, Liang Yang, Xian-Sheng Hua, Hongfei Lin

TL;DR
This paper introduces a framework for large language models to express uncertainty in subjectivity analysis, aligning model confidence with human disagreement to improve reliability.
Contribution
The proposed DPUA framework jointly models predictions, rationales, and uncertainty, enhancing sensitivity to disagreement and aligning confidence with human judgment.
Findings
DPUA maintains task performance while better reflecting human disagreement.
It reduces overconfidence on boundary samples.
Improves out-of-distribution generalization.
Abstract
Large language models for subjectivity analysis are typically trained with aggregated labels, which compress variations in human judgment into a single supervision signal. This paradigm overlooks the intrinsic uncertainty of low-agreement samples and often induces overconfident predictions, undermining reliability and generalization in complex subjective settings. In this work, we advocate uncertainty-aware subjectivity analysis, where models are expected to make predictions while expressing uncertainty that reflects human disagreement. To operationalize this perspective, we propose a two-phase Disagreement Perception and Uncertainty Alignment (DPUA) framework. Specifically, DPUA jointly models label prediction, rationale generation, and uncertainty expression under an uncertainty-aware setting. In the disagreement perception phase, adaptive decoupled learning enhances the model's…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
