Fix the Loss, Not the Radius: Rethinking the Adversarial Perturbation of Sharpness-Aware Minimization
Jinping Wang, Qinhan Liu, Zhiwu Xie, Zhiqiang Gao

TL;DR
This paper introduces Loss-Equated SAM (LE-SAM), a novel approach that focuses on loss-space budgets rather than fixed radii, leading to improved generalization and state-of-the-art results.
Contribution
LE-SAM redefines adversarial perturbation by inverting SAM's mechanism, emphasizing curvature over gradient norms for better optimization.
Findings
LE-SAM outperforms SAM and variants across multiple benchmarks.
LE-SAM achieves state-of-the-art generalization performance.
Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of LE-SAM.
Abstract
Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) improves generalization by minimizing the worst-case loss within a fixed parameter-space radius neighborhood. SAM and its variants mainly rely on a first-order linearized surrogate, while flat minima are inherently a second-order (curvature) notion.We revisit this mismatch and propose Loss-Equated SAM (LE-SAM), which inverts the traditional SAM mechanism that fixed perturbation radius with a fixed loss-space budget,effectively removing gradient-norm-dominated learning signals and shifting optimization toward curvature-dominated terms. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks and tasks demonstrate the strong generalization ability of LESAM that consistently outperforms SAM and even its variants, achieving the state-of-the-art performance.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
