Stardust Galaxies at z>9: A Dust-Origin Transition Behind the Excess of UV-Bright Galaxies
D. Burgarella, V. Buat, A.K. Inoue, T.T. Takeuchi, C. Aurin, J.-C. Bouret, P. Dayal, T. Dewachter, M. Dickinson, C. Kobayashi, G. P. Nikopoulos, R. S. Somerville

TL;DR
This study proposes a model where low-opacity supernova-produced dust dominates early galaxies at z>9, explaining the observed excess of UV-bright galaxies and low dust attenuation without invoking extreme star-formation efficiencies.
Contribution
It introduces a physically motivated attenuation framework combining supernova dust, metallicity effects, and porous geometries to explain early galaxy observations.
Findings
Best reproduced the A_FUV-M_star relation with low-opacity SNe dust.
Models suppress brightest galaxies, aligning with JWST data.
Supports a dust origin transition as key to early galaxy UV properties.
Abstract
Recent JWST observations suggest that galaxies at z > 9 may be dominated by low-opacity SNe-produced dust before efficient ISM grain growth is established. This transition in dust origin and opacity could explain both the prevalence of galaxies with extremely low dust attenuation and the excess of UV-bright galaxies relative to most pre-JWST predictions. We investigate whether this transition, combined with evolving star-formation efficiency, can reproduce these observed properties. We develop a physically motivated attenuation framework combining (i) extinction laws for reverse-shock-processed SNe dust, (ii) metallicity- and dust-to-metal-dependent opacity scalings, and (iii) porous radiative-transfer geometries allowing partial UV-photon leakage. Unlike outflow-driven scenarios requiring large-scale gas evacuation, our approach preserves gas reservoirs while reducing effective UV…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
