Understanding Robust Catalytic Computing
Michal Kouck\'y, Ian Mertz, Sasha Sami

TL;DR
This paper extends the concept of lossy catalytic computing by defining and analyzing new models with various error allowances, providing a comprehensive characterization and implications for complexity classes.
Contribution
It introduces three natural extensions of catalytic computing with bounded or probabilistic errors and characterizes their relationships to classical complexity classes.
Findings
Complete characterization of the new catalytic models in general and logspace regimes.
Equivalences established between error models and classical complexity classes.
Under derandomization, catalytic classes collapse in the logspace regime.
Abstract
Catalytic computing concerns space bounded computation which starts with memory full of data that have to be restored by the end of the computation. Lossy catalytic computing, defined by Gupta et al. (2024) and fully characterized by Folkertsma et al. (ITCS 2025), is the study of allowing a small number of errors when resetting the catalytic tape at the end of a computation. Such a notion is useful when considering the robust use of catalytic techniques in the study of ordinary space-bounded algorithms. To that end however, defining and characterizing less strict notions of error was left open by Folkertsma et al. (ITCS 2025) and other works such as Mertz (B. EATCS, 2023). We expand the definition of possible resetting error in three natural ways: 1. randomized catalytic computation which can completely destroy the catalytic tape with some probability over the randomness 2.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
