
TL;DR
This paper refines the concept of parity complexes, demonstrating their categorical equivalence to strong Steiner complexes and highlighting the combinatorial advantages of Steiner's formalism.
Contribution
It redefines parity complexes with a specific set of axioms and proves their categorical equivalence to strong Steiner complexes, emphasizing the combinatorial structure of bases.
Findings
Parity complexes form a category equivalent to strong Steiner complexes.
The combinatorial structure of bases in free augmented directed complexes is characterized.
Steiner's formalism uses multisets instead of subsets, offering advantages.
Abstract
We fix the notion of parity complex by a judicious selection from among the axioms originally considered by Street. We show that parity complexes so defined, together with the morphisms of parity complexes defined by Verity, form a category equivalent to the category of strong Steiner complexes (n\'es augmented directed complexes with strongly loop-free unital bases). To this end, we isolate the purely combinatorial structure possessed by the bases of free augmented directed complexes. This analysis reveals the essential advantage of Steiner's formalism to be that the role of subsets in Street's formalism is played instead by multisets.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
