How to count clustered galaxies
Yunting Wang, Ryley Hill, Douglas Scott, Tessa Vernstrom

TL;DR
This paper develops an empirical correction method for galaxy number counts affected by clustering bias in confusion-limited surveys, improving accuracy in submillimetre galaxy studies.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach combining 1- and 2-point statistics to measure and correct clustering bias in galaxy counts from confusion-limited data.
Findings
Clustering inflates counts by a factor of 1.6 at 500μm around 10mJy.
The method provides revised counts at 250, 350, and 500μm.
Bias correction improves the accuracy of galaxy evolution studies.
Abstract
Obtaining robust galaxy number counts is crucial for understanding galaxy evolution, and submillimetre counts in particular have proven valuable for revising subgrid physics models in cosmological simulations. In confusion-limited surveys, which are common at these wavelengths, statistical methods such as fluctuation analysis are required to recover counts of faint, unresolved galaxies. However, the standard framework assumes that galaxies are Poisson-distributed, whereas in reality galaxies are clustered. Using simulations, we demonstrate that this clustering systematically biases -derived number counts, and present an empirical method that simultaneously measures and corrects for this bias by combining the 1- and 2-point statistics in the map, thereby maximising the information extracted from the data. Applying this method to deep Herschel-SPIRE observations of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
