Reionisation time field reconstruction from 21-cm Maps: Investigating predictor coherence in WDM cosmology

TL;DR

This study evaluates the coherence of CNN-based reionisation time field reconstructions from 21-cm maps across different dark matter models, emphasizing the importance of model validation for reliable cosmological inferences.

Contribution

It introduces a method to assess CNN predictor coherence with input models, enabling validation of reionisation models before applying to observational data.

Findings

Predictors trained on 5 and 7 keV WDM models show high self-consistency.

Predictors trained on 2 keV and 3 keV WDM models exhibit significant deviations.

CNN predictors are sensitive to underlying reionisation models, aiding model validation.

Abstract

The reionisation time field treion(r) captures the entire history of cosmic reionisation by mapping the moment where each region of the Universe became ionised. Previous work has shown that treion(r) can be inferred from 21-cm observations, using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). However, these CNN predictors are trained on specific reionisation models, raising critical concerns about their reliability when applied to observational data potentially differing from their training assumptions. This paper aims to propose and test a method to evaluate the coherence of our CNN predictors with respect to their input model, thereby enabling the validation or exclusion of underlying reionisation models based on their reconstruction behaviour. By setting the CDM model as reference input, we evaluate the coherence of treion(r) reconstructions by comparing them across different redshifts for several prediction models as the statistics of treion (r) reconstructions should be the same for every redshift of the input maps. Our study particularly investigates CNNs trained on cold and warm dark matter (WDM) models, with WDM particle masses of 2, 3, 5, and 7 keV. We find that the predictors trained on 5 and 7 keV WDM models exhibit high-level self-consistency similar to the CDM predictor, while the 2 keV predictor, and to a lesser extent the 3 keV predictor, display significant deviations across several metrics. These findings seem to demonstrate that CNN predictors retain sensitivity to differences in the underlying reionisation model and can be used to assess model compatibility with observations. Our results highlight the necessity of validating machine-learning predictors against their input models before applying them to real data. The method proposed here offers a pathway to more trustworthy applications of CNNs in the study of reionisation.