Horizontal and Longitudinal Comparisons Among AI Subfields: A Bibliometric Perspective
Zeyu Li, Yalan Jin, Shuyu Chen, Tingxin Jiang, Xinyi Chang, Lu Yuan

TL;DR
This study uses bibliometric methods to analyze the structural evolution and differentiation of AI subfields from 2000 to 2024, revealing increased impact, collaboration, and interdisciplinary reliance.
Contribution
It introduces a multidimensional bibliometric framework and provides the first comprehensive long-term comparison of AI subfields' structural evolution.
Findings
AI impact and dissemination have increased significantly.
Subfields show distinct structural characteristics and trajectories.
Knowledge diffusion has shifted from closed to open, interdisciplinary networks.
Abstract
Recent artificial intelligence has developed rapidly with significant interdisciplinary expansion, yet existing studies often treat it as a whole, lacking systematic long-term subfield comparisons and structural analyses, thereby limiting understanding of internal differences and evolutionary mechanisms. To address this gap, we employ bibliometric methods, using expert interviews and indicator screening to construct an analytical framework. Twelve bibliometric indicators are selected across three dimensions: Impact and Dissemination, Collaboration Characteristics, and Author Characteristics. We conduct horizontal and longitudinal analyses of five subfields (AI, CV, ML, NLP, Web\&IR) from 2000 to 2024. Using CSRankings classification and a dataset of 106,622 papers, we apply violin plots, chord diagrams, and sankey diagrams to characterize structural features and evolutionary paths.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
