
TL;DR
This paper improves approximation ratios for fair division of indivisible goods among agents with XOS valuations, surpassing 1/4 for large numbers of agents by analyzing the gap between APS and MMS.
Contribution
It introduces an algorithm that guarantees better than 11/40 of the APS for agents with identical XOS valuations and extends this to larger groups with diverse valuations.
Findings
Achieved an approximation ratio greater than 11/40 for the APS.
Extended the algorithm to handle agents with different XOS valuations.
Proved the existence of an $rac{11}{40}$-APS allocation for sufficiently large n.
Abstract
We consider allocations of a set of indivisible goods to agents of equal entitlements that have valuations from the class XOS. A previous sequence of works showed allocations that obtain an -approximation for the maximin share (MMS), for values of that gradually approach from below (the currently known ratio is ). In this work we attempt to obtain ratios better than , and manage to do so for sufficiently large . Our methodology is to first investigate the gap between the anyprice share (APS) and the MMS when all agents have the same XOS valuations, for which we design an allocation algorithm and prove that each agent receives at least times the APS. Then, we derive inspiration from this algorithm, and modify it so that it applies also when agents have different XOS valuations. Using this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
