Trajectory-Consistent Flow Matching for Robust Visuomotor Policy Learning
Riad Ahmed, Sujosh Nag, Moniruzzaman Akash, Mostafa Hussein, and Momotaz Begum

TL;DR
This paper introduces a set of techniques to improve flow matching policies for robot manipulation, addressing trajectory errors caused by training-inference mismatches and enhancing robustness in real-world tasks.
Contribution
The authors propose four complementary methods—velocity supervision, trajectory consistency, regularization, and RK4 inference—to significantly improve flow matching policy robustness and accuracy.
Findings
Achieved 70% and 60% success rates on long-horizon tasks where baselines failed.
Reached 100% success on precision tool placement tasks.
Validated improvements across four real-robot tasks and three simulation benchmarks.
Abstract
Flow matching policies learn continuous velocity fields that transport noise to actions, enabling fast deterministic inference for robot manipulation. However, standard training optimizes a pointwise velocity objective while inference requires numerical integration of that field -- a mismatch that causes compounding trajectory errors. We propose four complementary remedies: (1) auxiliary rectified flow velocity regression that provides uniform temporal supervision across the full time interval; (2) multi-step trajectory consistency training that supervises the integrated displacement of the velocity field over trajectory segments, directly closing the train-inference gap; (3) velocity field regularization that enforces temporal smoothness, preventing oscillations that destabilize integration; and (4) fourth-order Runge-Kutta (RK4) inference that reduces global discretization error by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
