Is Class Signal Clustered or Routed in Task-Induced Implicit Neural Representation Weight Spaces?
Xinyi Guo, Mingyi He, Haobin Ding, Weiming Chen, Xinrui Chen, Jiawen Li, Di Zhang, Minxi Ouyang, Yizhi Wang, Xitong Ling

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether class signals in implicit neural representations are geometrically clustered or routed through the network, finding that routing rather than clustering explains classifiability.
Contribution
It reveals that class signals in INR weights are routed via the reader rather than forming geometric clusters, challenging prior hypotheses.
Findings
Clustering in weight space does not reliably predict classification accuracy.
Class-aligned neighborhoods become predictive only after late reader interactions.
Routing mechanisms, not clustering, explain class signal in INR weights.
Abstract
Implicit neural representations (INRs) encode images as neural-network weights, making image classification a problem of weight-space classifiability. A natural geometric hypothesis is that classifier feedback should make image-specific weights cluster by class in the shared-anchor coordinate. We test this hypothesis in the SIREN-based Meta Weight Transformer (MWT) regime, where end-to-end training meta-learns a shared initialization and inner-loop update schedule for fitting image-specific SIRENs. We find that this prediction fails. Exposed weight-space geometry and supervised clustering pressure do not reliably track trained-reader accuracy; clustering can even make local neighborhoods more class-consistent while making the trained reader worse. Crucially, the reader constructs rather than inherits class-aligned geometry: token-flow diagnostics show that class-aligned neighborhoods…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
