Bourbaki--Zorn Normal Forms for Maximality Arguments
You-Chang Liu

TL;DR
This paper introduces a normal-form framework for Bourbaki--Witt fixed-point arguments and Zorn maximality principles, showing fixed points under weaker completeness assumptions and establishing a new maximality principle.
Contribution
It provides a reusable proof architecture linking fixed points, progression obstructions, and maximality arguments, with a focus on methodological insights.
Findings
Least upper bounds suffice for fixed points in certain posets.
Strictly progressive self-maps cannot exist in these posets.
A maximal element exists if every nonempty well-ordered subset has a least upper bound.
Abstract
We isolate a normal-form mechanism underlying Bourbaki--Witt fixed-point arguments and least-upper-bound versions of Zorn-type maximality principles. Given a progressive self-map on a partially ordered set, we define a Bourbaki tower as a well-ordered trajectory whose successor stages are generated by the map and whose limit stages are given by least upper bounds of earlier stages. We prove that least upper bounds for nonempty well-ordered subsets are sufficient to force a fixed point for every progressive self-map. Thus the fixed-point statement is obtained under a weaker completeness hypothesis than the usual chain-complete form of the Bourbaki--Witt theorem. The proof proceeds by constructing a largest Bourbaki tower. The least upper bound of this largest tower belongs to the tower itself and is a fixed point of the map. As a consequence, strictly progressive self-maps cannot exist…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
