Trustworthiness in Digital Twin Systems: Systematic Review and Research Horizons
Chi Fai David Lam (1), Aad van Moorsel (1), Zoya Pourmirza (1) ((1) University of Birmingham, United Kingdom)

TL;DR
This systematic review examines how trust issues are addressed in Digital Twin systems across domains, identifying patterns, challenges, strategies, and proposing future research directions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive mapping of trust-related challenges and strategies in Digital Twins, categorizing deployment contexts and suggesting trust-by-design principles.
Findings
Identified four trust integration types: human-centred, safety-critical, context-specific, and technologically-driven.
Mapped patterns of trust concerns across different application domains.
Proposed future research directions including trust-by-design and architectural influence on trust.
Abstract
Digital Twins (DTs) are increasingly deployed across application domains, yet the treatment of trust-related issues remains unevenly addressed. To examine whether and how trust is discussed in the current landscape, we conducted a systematic review of existing DT review papers and a mapping of their abstracts. Seven trust-related challenges and seven trust-enhancing strategies were defined to guide the analysis, enabling the trust focus of each paper to be characterised. By aggregating the challenges and strategies referenced across domains, distinct patterns of emphasis were observed. With certain domains consistently sharing similar spectrum of trust concerns, four integration types, including human-centred, safety-critical, context-specific, and technologically-driven, were identified as emergent categories reflecting how trust is prioritised in different deployment contexts.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
