Ion-Optical Tuning of the Large Acceptance Spectrometer for Improved Angular Resolution and Acceptance
Taichi Miyagawa, Junki Tanaka, Shinsuke Ota, Masanori Dozono, Nobuyuki Kobayashi, Lakmin Wickremasinghe, Fumiya Furukawa, Daichi Ishii, Sho Nishioka, Kota Takahashi, Erika Ukai

TL;DR
This paper evaluates how ion-optical tuning of the Large Acceptance Spectrometer affects angular resolution and acceptance, demonstrating a trade-off influenced by magnet field strength and focusing adjustments.
Contribution
It provides a quantitative analysis of the resolution-acceptance trade-off in LAS and explores how magnetic field strength and focusing impact spectrometer performance.
Findings
Resolution improves with increased field strength, reaching about 5.5 mrad at +20%.
Stronger fields decrease acceptance and solid angle.
Enhanced focusing allows high-precision angle reconstruction.
Abstract
The trade-off between angular resolution and acceptance in scattering-angle measurements with a magnetic spectrometer is quantitatively evaluated for the Large Acceptance Spectrometer (LAS). The dependence on the multipole magnet field strength is investigated. Third-order transfer matrices were calculated with GICOSY, and particle transport was simulated with MOCADI. The vertical angular resolution is defined as the standard deviation between reconstructed and true angles, while the acceptance is determined from the transport efficiency within an elliptical gate in target angle space. The resolution improves with increasing field strength, reaching mrad at +20\%, consistent with mrad. In contrast, stronger fields reduce the vertical acceptance and solid angle. These results demonstrate a trade-off between resolution and acceptance. Enhanced vertical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
