A Comparative Analysis of Classical Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Sentiment Classification on IMDb Movie Reviews
Erma Daniar Safitri, Lia Hana Ichisasmita, Citra Agustin, Luluk Muthoharoh, Ardika Satria, and Martin Clinton Tosima Manullang

TL;DR
This study compares classical machine learning and deep learning methods for sentiment analysis on IMDb reviews, finding classical models like SVM outperform deep learning in accuracy.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison showing classical ML with TF-IDF can outperform deep learning models like BiLSTM with attention on this task.
Findings
SVM achieved the highest accuracy of 0.8530.
BiLSTM with Attention improved over standard BiLSTM.
Classical ML remains competitive with deep learning under limited resources.
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative study of classical machine learning and deep learning methods for sentiment classification on the IMDb movie reviews dataset. The machine learning pipeline uses TF-IDF features and PyCaret AutoML to evaluate Logistic Regression, Na\"ive Bayes, and Support Vector Machine, while the deep learning pipeline implements BiLSTM and BiLSTM with an attention mechanism. Experimental results show that classical machine learning, especially SVM, achieves the best performance with an accuracy of 0.8530, outperforming the deep learning models in this study. The BiLSTM with Attention model improves over the standard BiLSTM and reaches an accuracy of 0.706, indicating better contextual modeling. The paper concludes that although deep learning can capture sequential dependencies, classical machine learning remains a strong baseline when combined with effective feature…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
