MAVEN: Multi-Agent Verification-Elaboration Network with In-Step Epistemic Auditing
Yinsheng Yao, Jiehao Tang, Zhaozhen Yang, Dawei Cheng

TL;DR
MAVEN introduces a modular multi-agent framework for large language models that enhances interpretability, verification, and reasoning accuracy through explicit role-decoupling and adversarial deliberation loops.
Contribution
The paper presents MAVEN, a novel multi-agent architecture with in-step epistemic auditing that improves reasoning transparency and performance over existing monolithic models.
Findings
MAVEN outperforms latent reasoning models like GEMINI-3.1-Pro on multiple benchmarks.
It generates structured, verifiable reasoning trajectories instead of implicit states.
MAVEN is model-agnostic and enhances diverse backbone models.
Abstract
While explicit reasoning trajectories enhance model interpretability, existing paradigms often rely on monolithic chains that lack intermediate verification, allowing early errors to cascade unchecked. This lack of modularity impedes granular auditing and compromises the epistemic trust required for high-stakes applications. We propose MAVEN (Multi-Agent Verification-Elaboration Network with In-Step Epistemic Auditing), a blackboard-inspired framework designed to transform LLMs into deliberate reasoners through explicit role-decoupling. At its core, MAVEN operationalizes an adversarial Skeptic-Researcher-Judge loop, simulating expert deliberation by functionally separating logical defense from factual grounding. Experiments on OpenBookQA, TruthfulQA, HALUEVAL and StrategyQA benchmarks demonstrate that MAVEN delivers superior reasoning quality across four fine-grained metrics. Notably,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
