TL;DR
This survey explores the concept of agent skills as reusable procedural components that enhance the scalability, robustness, and maintainability of LLM-based agents across various stages of their lifecycle.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive framework for understanding, organizing, and advancing agent skills, including representation, acquisition, retrieval, and evolution.
Findings
Organized literature around four stages of agent skill lifecycle.
Reviewed methods, resources, and applications for each stage.
Discussed open challenges like quality control and safe updating.
Abstract
Large language model (LLM)-based agents that reason, plan, and act through tools, memory, and structured interaction are emerging as a promising paradigm for automating complex workflows. Recent systems such as OpenClaw and Claude Code exemplify a broader shift from passive response generation to action-oriented task execution. Yet as agents move toward open-ended, real-world deployment, relying on from-scratch reasoning and low-level tool calls for every task become increasingly inefficient, error-prone, and hard to maintain. This survey examines this challenge through the lens of \emph{agent skills}, which we define as reusable procedural artifacts that coordinate tools, memory, and runtime context under task-specific constraints. Under this view, agents and skills play complementary roles: agents handle high-level reasoning and planning, while skills form the operational layer that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
