TL;DR
Flux Matching introduces a flexible generative modeling framework that generalizes score-based models by allowing non-conservative vector fields, enabling diverse applications like faster sampling and interpretable models.
Contribution
It proposes Flux Matching, a novel paradigm that relaxes score matching constraints, allowing direct design of vector fields for improved generative modeling.
Findings
Performs strongly on high-dimensional image datasets.
Enables faster sampling and interpretable models.
Supports dynamics with directed dependencies.
Abstract
We introduce Flux Matching, a new paradigm for generative modeling that generalizes existing score-based models to a broader family of vector fields that need not be conservative. Rather than requiring the model to equal the data score, the Flux Matching objective imposes a weaker condition that admits infinitely many vector fields whose stationary distribution is the data. This flexibility enables a class of generative models that cannot be learned under score matching, in which inductive biases, structural priors, and properties of the dynamics can be directly imposed or optimized. We show that Flux Matching performs strongly on high-dimensional image datasets and, more importantly, that our added freedom unlocks a range of applications including faster sampling, interpretable and mechanistic models, and dynamics that encode directed dependencies between variables. More broadly, Flux…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
