Transporting treatment effects by calibrating large-scale observational outcomes
Harrison H Li

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method to accurately estimate and infer treatment effects transported from large observational datasets to smaller experimental datasets, even with potential biases and model misspecification.
Contribution
It proposes a calibration-based estimator for transported treatment effects that remains valid and efficient under misspecification and varying dataset sizes.
Findings
Estimator is consistent even with misspecified calibration models.
Inference remains valid and semiparametrically efficient as dataset sizes vary.
Method performs well in simulations and real data on crop yields.
Abstract
A high-quality experimental dataset is often much smaller than a corresponding observational dataset. When this holds with possibly biased measurements of the outcome of interest in the latter, we propose an estimation and inference procedure for a transported treatment effect. Our point estimator can be computed as follows. First, we estimate the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) by calibrating a treatment-control contrast estimated using the observational outcomes to the experimental dataset using ordinary least squares (OLS). Then, we compute the sample average of this estimated CATE over the observational dataset. We show that the limiting estimand is a weighted transported average treatment effect even when the OLS calibration is misspecified. Furthermore, our inference for this estimand is asymptotically valid and semiparametrically efficient when the size of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
