From Assistance to Agency: Rethinking Autonomy and Control in CI/CD Pipelines
Marcus Emmanuel Barnes, Taher A. Ghaleb, Safwat Hassan

TL;DR
This paper explores the concept of agentic autonomy in CI/CD pipelines, emphasizing the importance of designing authority transfer and governance mechanisms for safer, more autonomous software deployment.
Contribution
It introduces a framework distinguishing data-plane and control-plane authority, highlighting current limitations and proposing a research agenda for safety and formalization.
Findings
Current systems mainly operate at the data plane with bounded autonomy.
Safety relies on external governance rather than intrinsic agent guarantees.
There is a widening gap between deployment momentum and evaluation methods.
Abstract
AI agents are assuming active roles in Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) workflows, yet the research community lacks a shared vocabulary for describing what it means for CI/CD to be agentic, how much decision authority is delegated, and where control should reside. This paper presents a vision of agentic CI/CD in which the central challenge is not improving task performance but designing authority transfer, defined as the delegation of operational decisions from human-controlled pipelines to agent systems under specified constraints and recourse mechanisms. To structure this argument, we introduce a distinction between data-plane authority (localized interventions such as patch generation and test reruns) and control-plane authority (modifications to pipeline configuration, deployment policies, and approval gates). Drawing on research prototypes and industrial…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
