Overcoming data scarcity through multi-center federated learning for organs-at-risk segmentation in pediatric upper abdominal radiotherapy

TL;DR

This study demonstrates that federated learning can effectively develop robust pediatric-specific organs-at-risk segmentation models across multiple centers, overcoming data scarcity and fragmentation issues.

Contribution

It is the first to evaluate federated learning for pediatric OAR segmentation across centers, showing improved cross-center robustness and performance stability.

Findings

Federated learning matched or exceeded local model performance for most organs.

FL improved cross-center segmentation robustness and reduced false positives.

Model performance was stable across different patient orientations.

Abstract

Deep learning-based organs/structures-at-risk(OARs) auto-contouring models can improve radiotherapy workflows, but models trained on adult data often underperform in pediatric patients. Developing robust pediatric-specific models is hindered by data scarcity and fragmentation across centers. Federated learning (FL) enables privacy-preserving collaborative training without the need for data sharing. We evaluated the feasibility and performance of FL for developing pediatric-specific OAR segmentation models across two European medical centers. Computed tomography (CT) images from pediatric patients from Utrecht and Heidelberg with a renal tumor or abdominal neuroblastoma were retrospectively collected and locally processed. An nnU-Net-based framework segmented 19 OARs using local and FL schemes. FL was implemented with secure weight exchange on a cloud storage across institutional firewalls. Performance was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95th percentile Hausdorff distance, and mean surface distance. Robustness to patient orientation, false-positive segmentation of surgically removed kidneys, and failure cases were identified. A total of 310 postoperative CTs from 272 patients (105 renal tumors, 167 neuroblastomas) were included. Local models performed well on their respective center data but showed significantly reduced cross-center performance for four to seven of the nine evaluated OARs (DSC). In contrast, the FL model matched local performance for at least seven of nine OARs and achieved the best cross-center results across three metrics, with DSC gains of 0.003-0.007 over local models. FL also maintained stable performance across patient orientations and reduced false-positive kidney segmentations. Real-world FL improves cross-center robustness of CT-based OAR segmentation models in pediatric upper abdominal tumors.