LookWhen? Fast Video Recognition by Learning When, Where, and What to Compute

TL;DR

LookWhen is a framework that improves video recognition efficiency by learning when, where, and what to compute, reducing redundant processing while maintaining high accuracy across multiple datasets.

Contribution

It introduces a novel selector-extractor approach with effective supervision strategies for efficient video recognition, outperforming existing models in accuracy and speed.

Findings

LookWhen achieves better accuracy-computation trade-off than similar models.

It Pareto-dominates in accuracy-FLOPs on 9 out of 12 cases.

It is 6.7x faster than InternVideo2-B at equal accuracy.

Abstract

Transformers dominate video recognition. They split videos into tokens, and processing them has expensive superlinear computational cost. Yet videos are filled with redundancy, so we can question the need for this expense. We introduce LookWhen, a selector-extractor framework that factorizes video recognition into learning when, where, and what to compute. Our shallow selector gets a scaled-down video and quickly scores all tokens across space-time, while our deep extractor gets the top-K selected tokens to approximate full-video representations without actually processing all the tokens. A key challenge is defining effective supervision for selection and extraction. For selection pre-training, we introduce a score on representations that ranks tokens by uniqueness using a simple nearest-neighbor distance. For extraction pre-training, we distill both a video teacher and an image teacher, for which we normalize its frame-wise representations to learn what changes within videos. Through these strategies, our selector-extractor learns general and efficient representations for feature extraction or fine-tuning to a task. Through experiments on Kinetics-400, SSv2, Epic-Kitchens, Diving48, Jester, and Charades, we show that LookWhen achieves a better accuracy-computation trade-off than efficient models and upgraded baselines of similar size. LookWhen Pareto-dominates in accuracy-FLOPs on 9 of 12 cases (6 tasks x 2 settings) and roughly matches on 3. In accuracy-throughput, measuring time in practice, LookWhen is more efficient still at 6.7x faster than InternVideo2-B at equal accuracy.