The impact of envelope binding energies on the merger rate density of binary compact objects
Cecilia Sgalletta, Guglielmo Costa, Giuliano Iorio, Kendall Shepherd, Francesco Addari, Alessandro A. Trani, Michela Mapelli, Ugo N. di Carlo, Andrea Lapi, Alessandro Bressan, Mario Spera

TL;DR
This study assesses how different stellar models and definitions of core boundaries influence envelope binding energies, significantly affecting the predicted merger rates of binary compact objects.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive set of envelope binding energies from extensive stellar models and demonstrates their impact on binary merger rate predictions.
Findings
Internal energy sources can change binding energies by over an order of magnitude.
Different core boundary definitions have secondary effects on binding energies.
Using consistent stellar models alters merger rate density predictions by over an order of magnitude.
Abstract
The common envelope (CE) phase plays a key role in the formation of binary compact object systems. Its final outcome strongly depends on the envelope binding energy, but this quantity is often estimated using fitting formulas that are not fully consistent with the underlying stellar evolution models adopted in population-synthesis codes. Here, we investigate envelope binding energies across the most extensive stellar grid considered to date. Our stellar tracks, evolved with PARSEC v2.0, include hydrogen (H) -rich stars with metallicities ranging from (Population III stars) to , and initial masses between 2 and 2000 M, as well as pure-helium stars with masses from 0.36 to 350 M. We examine the sensitivity of the envelope binding energies to the selected core-envelope boundary definition and to different internal energy source contributions. For…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
