The galaxy ultraviolet luminosity function from $z=7$ to $15$ in the COLIBRE simulations
Shengdong Lu, Carlos S. Frenk, Cedric G. Lacey, Andrea Gebek, Joop Schaye, Shaun Cole, Sownak Bose, Anna Durrant, Nick Andreadis, Maarten Baes, Alejandro Ben\'itez-Llambay, Evgenii Chaikin, Camila Correa, Robert A. Crain, Filip Hu\v{s}ko, Robert J. McGibbon, Sylvia Ploeckinger

TL;DR
This study compares the UV luminosity functions predicted by COLIBRE simulations with JWST observations from redshift 7 to 15, revealing discrepancies at the bright end likely due to missing physical processes.
Contribution
It introduces detailed UVLF predictions from COLIBRE simulations and analyzes their evolution and comparison with observational data, highlighting the need for additional physics at high redshifts.
Findings
COLIBRE UVLFs match stellar mass function evolution up to z=12
Bright-end UVLFs are underluminous by 1-2.5 mag at z=7-15
Ignoring dust attenuation improves brightness but does not fully resolve discrepancies
Abstract
JWST has enabled the detection of galaxies in the earliest stages of cosmic history. We compare the ultraviolet luminosity functions (UVLFs) at redshifts predicted by the new cosmological hydrodynamics simulations, COLIBRE with observations, including those from JWST. The UV luminosities of COLIBRE galaxies are derived using the radiative transfer code SKIRT, which tracks stellar emission and its processing through the multi-phase interstellar medium and dust distribution predicted by COLIBRE. We find that although COLIBRE is consistent with the observed evolution of the stellar mass function up to , its dust-attenuated UVLFs fall systematically below the observations at the bright end: at the number density of , the brightest galaxies are underluminous by at , increasing to at .…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
