Quantifying Trade-Offs Between Stability and Goal-Obfuscation
Yixuan Wang, Dan Guralnik, Warren Dixon

TL;DR
This paper studies the trade-offs between an agent's goal privacy and stability in safety-critical autonomous systems, proposing a control framework that balances intent obfuscation with tracking accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces a novel joint control approach combining belief-state dynamics and privacy constraints using probabilistic control barrier functions.
Findings
Derived PCBF results for Bayesian update and resampling steps.
Established feasibility conditions for balancing privacy and tracking.
Proposed a control framework for intent privacy in adversarial settings.
Abstract
Safety-critical autonomy in adversarial settings demands more than Lyapunov stability of tracking error signals. An agent executing a goal-directed trajectory is intrinsically legible to a passive observer running online Bayesian inference, because the contractive dynamics of any Lyapunov basin of attraction concentrates posterior belief over the latent intent parameters. We initiates the study of intent privacy over a continuous state space as a joint control problem on the physical state combined with the latent belief state of a putative observer. With the main challenges concentrated around the analysis of the belief-state dynamics, the agent dynamics is assumed to be simple, modeled by the differential inclusion . That is, the agent is fully actuated with bounded unknown disturbance to the control input. The observer's intent inference process is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
