Algospeak, Hiding in the Open: The Trade-off Between Legible Meaning and Detection Avoidance
Jan Fillies, Ronald E. Robertson, Jeffrey Hancock

TL;DR
This paper investigates the balance between making content understandable and avoiding detection by models, introducing a framework and dataset to analyze Algospeak strategies in disinformation.
Contribution
It formalizes the dynamics of Algospeak, introduces the MUM concept, and provides a reproducible framework and dataset for studying modulation trade-offs.
Findings
Identified the threshold where modulation impairs understanding but enhances evasion.
Developed a dataset of 700 modulated COVID-19 disinformation items.
Analyzed the relationship between modulation levels, detectability, and understandability.
Abstract
As large language models (LLMs) increasingly mediate both content generation and moderation, linguistic evasion strategies known as Algospeak have intensified the coevolution between evaders and detectors. This research formalizes the underlying dynamics grounded in a joint action model: when Algospeak increases, detectability and understandability decrease. Further, the concept of Majority Understandable Modulation (MUM) is introduced and defined as the modulation level at which additional evasive alteration increases detector evasion but loses comprehension for the majority of recipients. To empirically probe this trade-off, we introduce a reproducible framework that can be used to create meaning-preserving, Algospeak-style variants, based on an existing taxonomy and with tunable modulation levels. Using COVID-19 disinformation as a first proof-by-example setting, we construct a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
