Constraining Galaxy Cluster Triaxiality via Weak Lensing -- I. Preparation for the Rubin Data Beyond Leading Order
Shenming Fu, Radhakrishnan Srinivasan, Tae-hyeon Shin, Rance Solomon, Deric Jones, Camille Avestruz, Yuanyuan Zhang, Michel Aguena, C\'eline Combet, Anthony Englert, Benjamin Levine, Alex I. Malz, Constantin Payerne, Marina Ricci, Anja von der Linden

TL;DR
This paper measures the projected shapes of galaxy clusters using weak lensing data, extending the analysis to second order ellipticity, and prepares for future large surveys like LSST and Euclid.
Contribution
It introduces a method to constrain galaxy cluster triaxiality from weak lensing, including second order ellipticity, and applies it to DES data as a precursor for LSST.
Findings
Projected ellipticity of 0.310 with uncertainties
No significant dependence of ellipticity on mass or redshift
Method verified with mock catalogs
Abstract
The 3D mass distributions of galaxy clusters are generally triaxial, a geometry that is difficult to constrain from projected observations. In this work, we measure the projected halo shapes of clusters from their weak lensing signatures using the triaxiality functionality in the Cluster Lensing Mass Modeling software, a tool developed by the Dark Energy Science Collaboration to analyze data from NSF-DOE Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). We measure ensemble halo ellipticity on the plane of the sky via axis-aligned stacking and multipole expansion of the weak lensing data. We study a precursor dataset -- the redMaPPer cluster catalog, the metacalibration shape catalog, and the Directional Neighborhood Fitting photometric redshift catalog from the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 public data release. We select clusters that have a high centering probability (>90%) of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
