
TL;DR
This paper argues that a plane angle can be both a dimensional and a dimensionless quantity depending on the context, advocating for its classification as a base quantity in SI units.
Contribution
It demonstrates that plane angles should be considered as base quantities in SI, with their own units, and clarifies their role in physical measurements and equations.
Findings
Plane angle is described as a dimensional quantity in measurements.
In theoretical physics, angles appear as dimensionless combinations in equations.
The paper advocates for including the radian as a base SI unit.
Abstract
For decades, metrologists have debated heatedly whether a plane angle is a dimensional or dimensionless quantity; whether it is a base quantity in the International System of Units (SI) or a derived quantity. Two main points of view have emerged in the international metrology community. Those who hold the first view believe that a plane angle is a dimensionless derived quantity equal to the ratio of two lengths, and its unit, the radian, is the dimensionless number one (1 rad = 1 m/m = 1). Those who hold the second view believe that a plane angle is a dimensional quantity with its own independent dimension, and its unit, the radian, is not the dimensionless number one, as is currently accepted in the SI. This article demonstrates that, depending on the physical situation, a plane angle is described by either a dimensional or a dimensionless quantity. When measuring, expressing, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
