Probing unknown nonperturbative effects in $b \to s \ell\ell$ with inclusive and exclusive observables
P. Alvarez-Cartelle, B. Capdevila, E. Lunghi, J. Matias

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether the observed deficits in $b o s \, \ell\ell$ decays are due to New Physics or unknown hadronic effects, proposing observables to distinguish these scenarios using inclusive and exclusive decay data.
Contribution
It introduces novel ratios of exclusive to inclusive decay modes that can differentiate between New Physics and hadronic effects, measurable by LHCb without normalization to $J/\psi K^{(*)}$.
Findings
Preliminary data slightly favors New Physics over hadronic explanations.
Comparison of inclusive and summed exclusive modes at high $q^2$ disfavors constant hadronic effects.
Projections suggest upcoming measurements can clarify the origin of the observed deficits.
Abstract
In this paper we revisit, from a different perspective, a long-standing question: ``Is the systematic deficit observed in all branching ratios mediated by a transition due to New Physics, or to a hypothetical constant unknown universal hadronic contribution that mimics New Physics?'' The key observation that allows us to distinguish between these two possibilities is that non-perturbative contributions associated with loops affect inclusive and exclusive modes differently. In inclusive decays, factorizable contributions are exactly determined from data on , while non-factorizable corrections are described by resolved-photon contributions at low and by local power corrections at high . In exclusive decays, by contrast, hypothetical charming-penguin effects, beyond those already…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
