TL;DR
SpatialEpiBench provides a standardized, realistic benchmark for evaluating spatiotemporal epidemic forecasting models, revealing current methods often underperform simple baselines and highlighting key challenges.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive benchmark with datasets, evaluation protocols, and insights into the limitations of existing spatial epidemic forecasting models.
Findings
Most models underperform a simple last-value baseline.
Major failure modes include poor outbreak anticipation and handling noise.
Limited utility of geographic adjacency in epidemiological predictions.
Abstract
Accurate epidemic forecasting is crucial for public health response, resource allocation, and outbreak intervention, but remains difficult with sparse, noisy, and highly non-stationary data. Because epidemics unfold across interacting regions, spatiotemporal methods are natural candidates for improving forecasts. Despite growing interest in spatial information, no standardized benchmark exists, and current evaluations often use simple chronological train-test splits that do not reflect real-time forecasting practice. We address this gap with SpatialEpiBench, a challenging benchmark for spatiotemporal epidemic forecasting in realistic public-health settings. SpatialEpiBench includes 11 epidemic datasets with standardized rolling evaluations and outbreak-specific metrics. We evaluate adjacency-informed forecasting models with widely used epidemic priors that adapt general models to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
