When Does $\ell_2$-Boosting Overfit Benignly? High-Dimensional Risk Asymptotics and the $\ell_1$ Implicit Bias
Ye Su, Jian Li, Yong Liu

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the risk behavior of $ ext{ell}_2$-Boosting in high-dimensional settings, revealing conditions under which benign overfitting occurs or fails, and proposes an early stopping rule for optimal prediction.
Contribution
It provides a novel high-dimensional risk analysis of $ ext{ell}_2$-Boosting with $ ext{ell}_1$ implicit bias, including a tuning-free early stopping criterion.
Findings
Benign overfitting fails at the linear rate under pure noise.
Risk converges to zero when tail dimensions are large, but only logarithmically.
An early stopping rule achieves minimax-optimal prediction rates.
Abstract
Benign overfitting is well-characterized in geometries, but its behavior under the implicit bias of greedy ensembles remains challenging. The analytical barrier stems from the non-linear coupling of coordinate selection thresholds, which invalidates standard spectral resolvent tools. To isolate this algorithmic bias, we characterize the high-dimensional risk of continuous-time -Boosting over features and samples. By coupling the Convex Gaussian Minimax Theorem with delicate asymptotic expansions of double-sided truncated Gaussian moments, we analytically resolve the non-smooth interpolant. Under an isotropic pure-noise model, we prove that benign overfitting fails at the linear rate: greedy selection localizes noise into sparse active sets, and the excess variance decays at a logarithmic rate for noise variance…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
