Trade-off Functions for DP-SGD with Subsampling based on Random Shuffling: Tight Upper and Lower Bounds
Marten van Dijk, Murat Bilgehan Ertan

TL;DR
This paper provides a tight, transparent analysis of the trade-off function for DP-SGD with random shuffling subsampling, offering explicit bounds and new proof techniques that improve understanding of privacy guarantees.
Contribution
It introduces a closed-form, interpretable analysis of DP-SGD with random shuffling, including new asymptotic results and a novel proof technique based on a generalized law of large numbers.
Findings
Derived tight bounds for DP-SGD with random shuffling within the $f$-DP framework.
Showed that a large number of rounds and samples are needed for meaningful privacy at certain noise levels.
Introduced a new proof technique extending Berry-Esseen to asymptotic regimes, revealing convergence to a random guessing limit.
Abstract
We derive a tight analysis of the trade-off function for Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) with subsampling based on random shuffling within the -DP framework. Our analysis covers the regime , where is the noise multiplier and is the number of rounds within a single epoch. Unlike -DP analyses for Poisson subsampling, which yield non-closed implicit formulas that can be machine computed but are non-transparent, random shuffling admits a tight analysis yielding transparent and interpretable closed-form bounds. Our concrete bounds, derived via the Berry-Esseen theorem, are tight up to constant factors within the proof framework. We demonstrate worked parameter settings for a single epoch () with a corresponding trade-off function , that is, only below the ideal random guessing diagonal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
