Beyond Fixed Benchmarks and Worst-Case Attacks: Dynamic Boundary Evaluation for Language Models
Haoxiang Wang, Da Yu, Huishuai Zhang

TL;DR
This paper introduces Dynamic Boundary Evaluation (DBE), a novel method for assessing large language models by locating their capability boundaries on a unified, difficulty-scaled benchmark, surpassing traditional fixed benchmarks.
Contribution
The authors propose DBE, which actively finds model-specific boundary items, creating a calibrated, adaptable evaluation framework covering safety, capability, and truthfulness.
Findings
DBE covers a broader spectrum of models without saturation.
It provides a calibrated item bank validated across 9 reference LLMs.
The evaluation protocol adapts to new models and expands coverage.
Abstract
Evaluating large language models (LLMs) today rests on fixed benchmarks that apply the same set of items to any model, producing ceiling and floor effects that mask capability gaps. We argue that the most informative evaluation signal lies at the boundary, where the per-prompt pass probability is near under random-sampling decoding, and propose Dynamic Boundary Evaluation (DBE), which actively locates each model's boundary and places it on a globally comparable difficulty scale. DBE delivers three artifacts: (i) a calibrated item bank covering safety, capability, and truthfulness, with per-item difficulty labels validated across reference LLMs; (ii) Skill-Guided Boundary Search (SGBS), a search algorithm that finds boundary items for a given target LLM using only API-level query access; and (iii) an evaluation protocol that places a new LLM on a unified ability scale and grows…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
