Joint modelling of time-dependent biomarker variability and time-to-event outcomes, a two-step approach
Felix Boakye Oppong, Dimitris Rizopoulos, Thierry Gorlia, Nicole Erler

TL;DR
This paper introduces a two-step flexible method to incorporate biomarker variability into joint models for survival analysis, enhancing prognostic accuracy without complex software.
Contribution
It proposes a computationally efficient two-step approach to model biomarker variability alongside mean trajectories in joint models, compatible with existing software.
Findings
Simulation studies show good performance of the method across scenarios.
Application to glioblastoma data reveals prognostic value of biomarker variability.
Method allows simultaneous modeling of multiple biomarkers.
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests that variability in longitudinal biomarkers, in addition to their mean trajectory, carries prognostic information for time-to-event outcomes. However, standard joint models typically capture only the expected value of the biomarker process, assuming constant residual variability across individuals and time. Fully joint extensions that model within-subject variability exist but are computationally demanding and require dedicated software packages. We propose a flexible two-step approach for incorporating biomarker variability into joint models. First, residuals (or their transformations) from a mixed-effects model are used to derive subject- and time-specific measures of variability. Second, these variability measures are included in a standard joint model, allowing their association with survival to be estimated alongside the mean biomarker trajectory. Our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
