Intentmaking and Sensemaking: Human Interaction with AI-Guided Mathematical Discovery
Alex B\"auerle, Adam Connors, Alexander Novikov, Adam Zsolt Wagner, Ng\^an V\~u, Fernanda Viegas, Martin Wattenberg, Lucas Dixon

TL;DR
This paper explores how expert mathematicians interact with AI tools like AlphaEvolve, highlighting the iterative processes of intentmaking and sensemaking in scientific discovery.
Contribution
It introduces the concepts of intentmaking and sensemaking as key workflows in human-AI collaborative mathematical research, based on a user study.
Findings
Identified intentmaking as a distinct workflow in AI-assisted discovery.
Described a cycle of defining goals and interpreting results during investigation.
Proposed design principles for AI tools that support scientific sensemaking.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence offers powerful new tools for scientific discovery, but the interaction paradigms required to effectively harness these systems remain underexplored. In this paper, we present findings from a formative user study with 11 expert mathematicians who used AlphaEvolve, an evolutionary coding agent, to tackle advanced problems in their fields of expertise. We identify and characterize a distinct workflow we term intentmaking, the iterative process of discovering, defining, and refining one's experimental goals through active system interaction. We frame this as a natural extension to sensemaking, the cognitive process of building an understanding of complex or novel data. We suggest that users enter a cycle of intentmaking (defining and updating their experiment) and sensemaking (interpreting the results) which repeats many times during the course of an investigation.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
