Surface-Code Thresholds and Qubit Footprints in Shuttling-Based Spin-Qubit Railways
Arun John Moncy, Reza Dastbasteh, Josu Etxezarreta Martinez, Ryo Nagai, Pedro M. Crespo, Normann Mertig, Charles Smith, and Ruben M. Otxoa

TL;DR
This paper proposes a fault-tolerant surface code implementation on a silicon spin-qubit railway, showing improved thresholds by shuttling check qubits and tailoring codes to noise bias, enabling hardware-efficient quantum error correction.
Contribution
It introduces a novel mapping of surface codes onto a shuttling-based architecture and demonstrates threshold improvements by exploiting noise bias and shuttling check qubits.
Findings
Shuttling check qubits enhances system thresholds.
Non-CSS XZZX surface code outperforms CSS variants under dephasing bias.
A distance 7 code can achieve a Megaquop footprint at a physical error rate of 10^{-3}.
Abstract
We present a fault-tolerant mapping of rotated surface codes onto a silicon spin-qubit railway architecture, utilizing electron shuttling to resolve the wiring fan-out bottleneck. Employing circuit-level noise modeling, we evaluate threshold performances across various noise biases. We demonstrate that shuttling check qubits instead of data qubits fundamentally improves system thresholds. Crucially, under a noise model biased towards dephasing for spin-qubit shuttling, the non-CSS XZZX surface code outperforms standard CSS variants. By tailoring the topological code to this specific inherent bias, we show that the Megaquop footprint is achievable with a distance 7 code requiring a physical error rate, highlighting a pathway for substantial hardware reductions in early fault-tolerant quantum processors.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
