Comparative Analysis of Direct-to-Cell (D2C) and 3GPP Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTN) for Global Connectivity
Donglin Wang, Anjie Qiu, Qiuheng Zhou, and Hans D. Schotten

TL;DR
This paper compares Direct-to-Cell (D2C) and 3GPP Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTN), analyzing their architectures, standardization, and suitability for future 6G applications, advocating for a hybrid approach for global connectivity.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive technical comparison of D2C and NTN, highlighting their respective advantages and proposing a hybrid architecture for enhanced global connectivity.
Findings
NTN offers better performance, security, and scalability than D2C.
D2C enables rapid deployment with legacy devices, but has limitations in scalability.
A hybrid terrestrial-satellite-D2C architecture is optimal for 6G use cases.
Abstract
The quest for ubiquitous mobile coverage has catalyzed two fundamentally distinct architectural paradigms: Direct-to-Cell (D2C) and standardized 3GPP Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTN). D2C, pioneered by SpaceX Starlink and AST SpaceMobile, leverages existing terrestrial spectrum and unmodified consumer handsets to provide emergency connectivity as a market-driven overlay. In contrast, 3GPP NTN, standardized across Releases 17-19, offers a systematic satellite-native framework designed for long-term scalability, high-throughput broadband, and deep integration with terrestrial 5G/6G networks. This paper presents a comprehensive technical comparison of these approaches, analyzing their standardization trajectories, network architectures, physical-layer innovations, security postures, and operational trade-offs. We further examine their implications for emerging 6G use cases, particularly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
