An Axiomatic Foundation for Decisions with Counterfactual Utility
Benedikt Koch, Kosuke Imai, Tomasz Strzalecki

TL;DR
This paper develops an axiomatic framework extending von Neumann-Morgenstern utility theory to counterfactual preferences, ensuring coherence and addressing paradoxes in decision-making involving hypothetical outcomes.
Contribution
It generalizes utility axioms to preferences over all potential outcomes, providing a coherent foundation for counterfactual utilities and resolving known decision paradoxes.
Findings
Expected counterfactual utility satisfies vNM axioms on extended domain
Framework reconciles inconsistencies like the Russian roulette example
Derives conditions for reducing counterfactual to standard utilities
Abstract
Counterfactual utilities evaluate decisions not only by the realized outcome under a given decision, but also by the counterfactual outcomes that would arise under alternative decisions. By generalizing standard utility frameworks, they allow decision-makers to encode asymmetric criteria, such as avoiding harm and anticipating regret. Recent work, however, has raised fundamental concerns about the coherence and transitivity of counterfactual utilities. We address these concerns by extending the von Neumann-Morgenstern (vNM) framework to preferences defined on the extended space of all potential outcomes rather than realized outcomes alone. We show that expected counterfactual utility satisfies the vNM axioms on this extended domain, thereby admitting a coherent preference representation. We further examine how counterfactual preferences map onto the realized outcome space through…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
