Partial Evidence Bench: Benchmarking Authorization-Limited Evidence in Agentic Systems
Krti Tallam

TL;DR
Partial Evidence Bench is a new deterministic benchmark designed to evaluate how enterprise agents handle evidence access restrictions, focusing on answer completeness and safety in policy-constrained environments.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive benchmark with scenarios, metrics, and baselines to measure incomplete evidence handling and unsafe completeness in agentic systems.
Findings
Silent filtering is unsafe across all scenarios.
Explicit fail-and-report strategies prevent unsafe completeness.
Model behavior varies with scenario, showing overclaiming or conservative reporting.
Abstract
Enterprise agents increasingly operate inside scoped retrieval systems, delegated workflows, and policy-constrained evidence environments. In these settings, access control can be enforced correctly while the system still produces an answer that appears complete even though material evidence lies outside the caller's authorization boundary. This paper introduces Partial Evidence Bench, a deterministic benchmark for measuring that failure mode. The benchmark ships three scenario families -- due diligence, compliance audit, and security incident response -- with 72 tasks total, ACL-partitioned corpora, oracle complete answers, oracle authorized-view answers, oracle completeness judgments, and structured gap-report oracles. It evaluates systems along four surfaces: answer correctness, completeness awareness, gap-report quality, and unsafe completeness behavior. Checked-in baselines show…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
