TL;DR
AdaGATE is a novel evidence controller for multi-hop retrieval-augmented generation that explicitly repairs missing facts and balances relevance, redundancy, and gap coverage, improving robustness and efficiency.
Contribution
It introduces AdaGATE, a training-free, gap-aware evidence selection method that enhances multi-hop RAG performance under noisy and limited retrieval conditions.
Findings
Achieves highest evidence F1 scores across all tested conditions.
Uses 2.6x fewer tokens than Adaptive-k in evidence selection.
Improves robustness of multi-hop RAG with explicit gap-aware repair.
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) remains brittle on multi-hop questions in realistic deployment settings, where retrieved evidence may be noisy or redundant and only limited context can be passed to the generator. Existing controllers address parts of this problem, but typically either expand context additively, select from a fixed top-k set, or optimize relevance without explicitly repairing missing bridge facts. We propose AdaGATE, a training-free evidence controller for multi-hop RAG that frames evidence selection as a token-constrained repair problem. AdaGATE combines entity centric gap tracking, targeted micro-query generation, and a utility based selection mechanism that balances gap coverage, corroboration, novelty, redundancy, and direct question relevance. We evaluate AdaGATE on HotpotQA under clean, redundancy, and noise injected retrieval conditions. Across all three…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
