Sharp Capacity Thresholds in Linear Associative Memory: From Winner-Take-All to Listwise Retrieval
Nicholas Barnfield, Juno Kim, Eshaan Nichani, Jason D. Lee, and Yue M. Lu

TL;DR
This paper investigates the capacity of linear associative memories under different retrieval criteria, revealing phase transitions and thresholds for winner-take-all and listwise retrieval regimes.
Contribution
It introduces a formal framework for understanding capacity thresholds in linear memory models, including a new listwise retrieval criterion and an asymptotic theory for its performance.
Findings
Top-1 retrieval requires $d^2 \\sim n \\log n$ scale.
Listwise retrieval capacity scales quadratically as $d^2 \\sim n$.
A conjectural sharp top-1 threshold is $d^2 \\sim 2n \\log n$.
Abstract
How many key-value associations can a linear memory store? We show that the answer depends not only on the degrees of freedom in the memory matrix, but also on the retrieval criterion. In an isotropic Gaussian model for the stored pairs, we show that top-1 retrieval, where every signal must beat its largest distractor, requires the logarithmic model-size scale . We prove that the correlation matrix memory construction, which stores associations by superposing key-target outer products, achieves this scale through a sharp phase transition, and that the same scaling is necessary for any linear memory. Thus the logarithm is the intrinsic extreme-value price of winner-take-all decoding. We next consider listwise retrieval, where the correct target need not be the unique top-scoring item but should remain among the strongest candidates. To formalize…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
