Are PTA measurements sensitive to gravitational wave non-Gaussianities?
Chiara Cecchini, Jonas El Gammal, Gabriele Franciolini, and Mauro Pieroni

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that current PTA data analysis methods cannot reliably detect non-Gaussian features in gravitational wave backgrounds without strong assumptions, even in idealized conditions.
Contribution
It shows that statistical tests on PTA data are insensitive to non-Gaussianities without specific model assumptions, challenging their use as discriminators.
Findings
PTA data analysis cannot distinguish Gaussian from non-Gaussian GWBs in idealized setups.
Sensitivity to non-Gaussian features is lost after data decorrelation.
Model-agnostic tests are insufficient for detecting non-Gaussianities in PTA data.
Abstract
Observing non-Gaussianity in the timing residuals of Pulsar Timing Arrays (PTAs) has recently attracted attention as a potential discriminator between astrophysical and cosmological origins of the observed Gravitational Wave (GW) signal. In this work, we show that even in an idealized signal-dominated setup, after decorrelating data to avoid spurious detections, statistical tests applied to PTA data cannot distinguish between Gaussian and non-Gaussian GWBs in a model-agnostic way. In particular, without making strong assumptions on the GW spectrum or the properties of the population, the sensitivity to any distinctive non-Gaussian feature is washed out.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
