Toward a Risk Assessment Framework for Institutional DeFi: A Nine-Dimension Approach
Eva Oberholzer, Valeriy Zamaraiev (ZWING Intelligence AG, Zug, Switzerland)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a comprehensive nine-dimension risk assessment framework for institutional DeFi, enhancing existing models with novel dimensions and structural analysis to better understand and mitigate risks.
Contribution
It extends prior DeFi risk taxonomies by adding three new dimensions and incorporates an ontology-based analysis for more explainable and composability-aware risk evaluation.
Findings
Retrospective analysis of 12 major DeFi incidents involving USD 2.5 billion in losses.
Five incidents required at least one novel risk dimension for full root-cause analysis.
The framework improves understanding of systemic risks in DeFi protocols.
Abstract
Decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols now intermediate over USD 100 billion in value, including regulated stablecoins and tokenized assets deployed as collateral, yet no widely adopted framework operationalizes risk assessment at the rigor institutional adoption demands. Existing approaches emphasize protocol-specific parameter optimization or conceptual taxonomies without providing explainable, composability-aware, and structurally independent assessment methodologies. We propose a nine-dimension DeFi risk assessment framework extending the six-dimension taxonomy introduced by Moody's Analytics and Gauntlet with three novel dimensions: composability risk, comprehension debt, and temporal risk dynamics. We additionally introduce a transparency confidence modifier separating assessment reliability from risk severity. The framework is grounded in structural analysis of protocol…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
