
TL;DR
This paper analyzes the economic tradeoffs of automation, considering its effects on productivity, income distribution, and welfare within a heterogeneous-agent general equilibrium framework.
Contribution
It introduces a dynamic model capturing how automation impacts output, wealth distribution, and household welfare, highlighting potential excesses driven by income and ownership structures.
Findings
Automation increases output, capital, and consumption under certain conditions.
Privately driven automation may be excessive due to income and ownership concentration.
Fiscal policy can influence automation's effects through taxation and redistribution.
Abstract
Automation raises productivity and reduces paid human labor, but it also reallocates income and ownership claims. This paper studies that tradeoff in a static benchmark and in a stationary heterogeneous-agent general equilibrium. Firms choose automation from a profit function. Households differ by skill and wealth, save in a capital/equity claim, and face incomplete insurance. Wages and returns are determined by market clearing from a Cobb--Douglas final-good firm, while the wealth distribution is pinned down by a Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman (HJB) equation and a Kolmogorov forward equation (KFE). The paper is deliberately two-sided. With strong productivity growth, high-skill complementarity, low obsolescence, and broad ownership, automation raises output, capital, and consumption. With strong exposure of low-wealth, high-marginal-propensity-to-consume (high-MPC) households and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
