TL;DR
This paper emphasizes that privacy considerations in Embodied AI should be integrated across the entire system lifecycle, proposing a unified framework to manage privacy-utility trade-offs in real-world deployments.
Contribution
It introduces SPINE, a comprehensive privacy-aware framework that manages privacy as a dynamic control signal across all stages of Embodied AI systems.
Findings
Privacy constraints influence downstream system behavior.
Fragmented privacy solutions are insufficient for real-world deployment.
Preliminary case studies validate the importance of integrated privacy management.
Abstract
Embodied AI (EAI) systems are rapidly transitioning from simulations into real-world domestic and other sensitive environments. However, recent EAI solutions have largely demonstrated advancements within isolated stages such as instruction, perception, planning and interaction, without considering their coupled privacy implications in high-frequency deployments where privacy leakage is often irreversible. This position paper argues that optimizing these components independently creates a systemic privacy crisis when deployed in sensitive settings, thereby advancing the position that privacy in EAI is a life cycle-level architectural constraint rather than a stage-local feature. To address these challenges, we propose Secure Privacy Integration in Next-generation Embodied AI (SPINE), a unified privacy-aware framework that treats privacy as a dynamic control signal governing cross-stage…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
