From Classical to Quantum-Mechanical Data Assimilation: A Comparison between DATO and QMDA
Emanuele Donno, Giovanni Conti, Paolo Oddo, Silvio Gualdi, Luca Mainetti, Giovanni Aloisio

TL;DR
This paper compares two operator-based data assimilation methods, DATO and QMDA, analyzing their mathematical structures, computational costs, and empirical performance on benchmark systems.
Contribution
It provides a unified operator-theoretic comparison of DATO and QMDA, highlighting their differences, advantages, and limitations in various observational regimes.
Findings
DATO and QMDA have distinct assimilation paradigms.
Both methods perform differently depending on observational noise and sparsity.
The study clarifies regimes where each method is most effective.
Abstract
Data assimilation provides a systematic framework for combining dynamical models with partial and noisy observations to infer the evolving state of a system. In this work, we undertake a comparative study of Data Assimilation with Transfer Operators (DATO) and Quantum Mechanical Data Assimilation (QMDA), focusing on their mathematical formulation, algorithmic structure, and empirical performance. Both methods are first cast within a common operator-theoretic framework, which makes it possible to compare, on a unified basis, their representations of uncertainty, forecast propagation, and assimilation updates. We then analyse their principal similarities and differences with respect to state-space structure, update mechanisms, structural preservation properties, and computational cost. To complement the theoretical analysis, we assess both approaches on benchmark dynamical systems across…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
