Building AI Companions that Prioritise Learning over Performance
Hassan Khosravi, Dragan Gasevic, Shazia Sadiq, Lixiang Yan, Jason Lodge, Jason Tangen, Paul Denny, Kristen DiCerbo, Simon Buckingham Shum, and Ryan S. Baker

TL;DR
This paper advocates for designing AI learning companions using LLMs that prioritize pedagogical support and adaptive learning, aiming to enhance genuine educational outcomes over mere task performance.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive framework for creating pedagogically informed, adaptive, and responsible AI learning companions, supported by diverse case studies.
Findings
Existing LLMs often undermine genuine learning.
A new framework for AI learning companions is proposed.
Case studies demonstrate potential and limitations of current tools.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming knowledge work by improving the quality and efficiency of tasks such as writing, coding, and data analysis. However, their growing use in education has exposed a learning-performance paradox: while they can enhance short-term task performance, they may also undermine genuine learning, including cognitive growth, knowledge transfer, and metacognitive development. This paper addresses the question of how artificial intelligence should be designed and used to support learning rather than merely improve immediate outputs. We introduce the concept of AI learning companions, defined as adaptive, pedagogically informed, LLM-powered agents designed for integration into learning environments. We propose a framework for their design built on three interrelated foundations: a pedagogical foundation focused on how students learn with AI, an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
