AxMoE: Characterizing the Impact of Approximate Multipliers on Mixture-of-Experts DNN Architectures

TL;DR

This study investigates how approximate multipliers affect the performance of various Mixture-of-Experts DNN architectures, revealing architecture-dependent resilience and recovery capabilities after retraining.

Contribution

First comprehensive analysis of approximate multiplication impacts on MoE DNNs, highlighting architecture-specific behaviors and recovery potential without prior work in this area.

Findings

Dense baseline is most resilient without retraining.

VGG architectures recover at moderate multipliers but not at aggressive ones.

Hard MoE outperforms Dense on ViT-Small under aggressive approximation after retraining.

Abstract

Deep neural network (DNN) inference at the edge demands simultaneous improvements in accuracy, computational efficiency, and energy consumption. Approximate computing and Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures have each been studied as independent routes towards efficient inference, the former by replacing exact arithmetic with low-power approximate multipliers, the latter by routing inputs through specialized expert sub-networks to enable conditional computation. However, their interaction remains entirely unexplored. This paper presents AxMoE, the first study of the impact of approximate multiplication on MoE DNN architectures. We evaluate three MoE variants: Hard MoE, Soft MoE, and Cluster MoE against dense baselines across three CNN architectures (ResNet-20, VGG11_bn, VGG19_bn) on CIFAR-100 and a Vision Transformer (ViT-Small) on Tiny ImageNet-200 dataset, using eight 8-bit signed multipliers (including one exact baseline) from the EvoApproxLib library. Results show that, without retraining, the Dense baseline is the most resilient topology across all CNN architectures, whereas on ViT-Small, all topologies degrade at comparable rates regardless of routing strategy. After approximate-aware retraining, recovery varies substantially across architectures, topologies, and multipliers. ResNet-20 achieves full recovery across the entire multiplier range, whereas VGG architectures recover at moderate multipliers but fail irreversibly at aggressive ones for all topologies except Cluster MoE on VGG11_bn; on ViT-Small, Hard MoE outperforms Dense under aggressive approximation at equal normalized inference cost. These results pave the way for future approximate MoE hardware-software co-design strategies.