Taming Additive Systematics via Redshift-Bin-Optimized Star-Galaxy Separation
Noah Weaverdyck, David Schlegel, Anand Raichoor, Ignacio Sevilla-Noarbe

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new star-galaxy separation method optimized for each redshift bin, reducing stellar contamination in galaxy samples for large-scale structure surveys, thereby improving cosmological measurements.
Contribution
It presents a novel color-space based star-galaxy separation approach combined with an optimal weighting scheme to mitigate systematic biases in cosmological data analysis.
Findings
Successfully applied to DES Y3 data, reducing stellar contamination to 1.3-5.5% across redshift bins.
Demonstrated improved separation over traditional morphological methods.
Effectively identified and removed residual stellar contamination in the galaxy sample.
Abstract
Contamination from stars in the galaxy samples of large-scale structure surveys can bias cosmological constraints if not tightly controlled. This is especially true for lens samples used for galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing probes, where contamination is a primary source of additive systematics. We propose an improved approach to star-galaxy separation and an optimal weighting scheme to jointly mitigate additive and multiplicative contamination of the density field at the map level. Our star-galaxy separation approach exploits the fact that photometric galaxy samples used for cosmological inference populate different regions of color-space than the full photometric dataset on which star-galaxy cuts are typically applied, and therefore optimizes star-galaxy separation for the galaxy samples in each redshift bin. This serves as a complementary approach to morphological…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
